Archive

Archive for May, 2011

City Shows Complete Disregard For People Walking/Cycling Over Weekend

May 31, 2011 4 comments

Dangerous by Design

(a new series)

Do you see anything wrong with this scene besides being an imperfect panoramic?

_


_

How about complete disregard for people who might happen to be using this area to walk or ride  bike. This is how the City  left the construction site at Division and Grandview over memorial weekend, one of the busiest weekends of the year. Did they even for a minute think about the hundreds, if not thousands of people who’d be passing through here over the last three days? It is already a difficult intersection to cross let alone having to deal with the complete mismanagement of a construction zone.

DIY Repair Squad

Did any of you navigate this site over the weekend? How did you manage? (If it was after Sunday afternoon, you might have noticed a slight change as it was opened up by volunteers.)

If you had an experience at this location and/or care about this issue, please consider sending the city manager and city commissioners an email TODAY to demand consideration and accessibility for all road users be “an essential part of highway construction, utility work, maintenance operations, and the management of traffic incidents” as described in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (PDF). This is the city’s responsibility–not a contractor’s, not a non-profit agency’s, but the City’s responsibility.

Email to: 

“Ben Bifoss” <bbifoss@traversecitymi.gov>, “Chris Bzdok” <chrisbzdok@gmail.com>, “Jim Carruthers” <jccarruthers@gmail.com>, “Barbara Budros” <bbudros2@ci.traverse-city.mi.us>, “Mary Ann Moore” <maryannmoore@charter.net>, “Jody Bergman” <jodyabergman@yahoo.com>, “Mike Gillman” <mgillman@conklinbenham.com>

_

What follows is my letter and is not intended as a template. Your’s can certainly be more concise and to the point.
__

To: City Manager Bifoss,

Upon rolling up to the Division-Grandview Ave. crosswalk this past weekend, I was flabbergasted at the lack of consideration for people walking or cycling in the construction area. There are certainly rules and guidelines that address situations like this, and I’d hope that basic common sense would have prevailed as well. Unfortunately, applications of both were found to be lacking.

Memorial weekend is one of the busiest weekends of the year city-wide, and is particularly a busy weekend for people utilizing the bayfront and adjacent multi-use trails and crosswalks. Yet, the signage and barriers at Div./Grandview completely blocked off access to an entire corner. This was not merely an inconvenience, this put hundreds of people in real danger as the arrangement gave no option other than to use the roadway on Division St. for travel north or south between Bay St. and the crosswalk. There was literally no alternative given for people on foot, bicycle or wheelchair to reach the bayfront or Bay St. This is completely irresponsible.

On Sunday, I watched several groups of people cross successfully (they weren’t hit or killed), but they crossed with confusion, frustration and high level of stress. Many of them were crossing with young children. I was told by one passerby that teenagers had earlier knocked down part of the orange barrier fence to access the torn-up sidewalk crossing Bay St., but that still didn’t serve all visitors, many of whom were reluctant to cross an official looking line.

 I then assisted a volunteer from TART Trails make minor improvements to provide clear direction and guide for people crossing this busy intersection. I’ve provided images below showing the before and after (more images here). We also improved the construction area at Bay St. and M-72 that similarly lacked consideration for people expecting to use the multi-use trail.

This is another example of the City’s lack of attention to basic provisions for people not in an automobile using our public rights of ways. The City needs to be ashamed, as this is not a one-time over-sight. This is another example that communicates a lack of understanding, and/or consideration, to not only the needs of people on foot or bicycle, but also to the basic responsibilities of government: the safety and security of citizens.

I appreciate the improvements being made in this section of the City. I’m proud that the City Commission recently voted to contribute to the widening of a gem of a trail. I also appreciate the discussions around the principles of complete streets I’ve had with City staff over the past 2 years in a number of forums, particularly in the transportation elements committee. That said, and despite of all the talk, staff continues to show a pattern of indifference, if not outright callousness, to fundamental tenets of streets designed for all users. This is only the latest example.

Complete streets are simply common sense and include the practice of providing for all users through temporary work zones. In fact, as I’m sure you’re aware, it is already standard in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices-part 6)(PDF) adopted in 2005. I’m not sure who ultimately is responsibly for situations like this, but it is certainly someone who either is ignoring the MUTCD, severely lacking common sense or could care less.

What can we do to help the City improve? Providing for non-motorized transportation is a re-occurring theme in this City, yet it seems like every project undertaken remains a struggle for those of us advocating for safe, convenient and comfortable choices.

Where is the leadership?

Sincerely,

Gary Howe

Traverse City, MI

Excellent Marketing: Velophile Dreams

May 31, 2011 Leave a comment

Video Tuesday

A nice ad by Planet Bike.

Smart Commute anyone?

__

Grumpy People Can And Will Adapt

May 30, 2011 Leave a comment

UPDATED 1PM 5/31: After the transcript was made available, the quote was corrected* and accredited.

Well Put

There’s always going to be groups of grumpy folks that came up during a time when streets were only for cars. And so, they’re going to have to adapt.

~ Tommy Wells, Washington D.C. council-member in support of D.C.’s bike share program (NPR)

Exactly. Good leadership recognizes when the grumpy dinosaurs are simply road blocks to good policies. I can think of several dinosaurs in positions of authority in NW Lower Michigan’s little corner who need to adapt or get out of the way.

_

EDITOR’S NOTE: I woke up to the above quote on the radio, so it might be slightly off. I’ll correct it once the full story is available later today at:  Bikeshare Program Rides High In D.C.

* Quote originally published as: “There will always be the grumpy people who grew up in the time when streets were just for cars. They are going to have to adapt.”

An Extreme Sport For Elders? Crossing America’s Streets. (Weekly Chatter)

May 27, 2011 1 comment

 

photo by Bill Palladino

Lot’s of press this week connecting complete streets and America’s aging population (AARP). The 2011 version of the national report Dangerous by Design (T4America) was released and NPR covered the need for safer streets for an aging population(NPR).

Transportation for America found that nationally, people older than 65 are 96% more likely to be killed while walking and it’s no better in Michigan (MyWHaT).

You can listen to the NPR’s segment here or read the transcript at: As Senior Population Grows, A Push To Make Streets Safer (NPR)


Weekly Chatter

_

Smart common sense riding? Hell yeah- but what they wear on their heads means less to me.” 

~ Suburban Bike Mama

“If you are an angry urbanist, you may need to change where you live, where you work, or who you work for. There is simply not enough time for you to waste your talents in a place that does not value you.” (The verdict is still out on NW L Michigan)

_

Retweets

  • RT (T4America) Comment: “Pay attention & watch where you are walking always works” Sure, like these places? http://flic.kr/p/7dyafM  http://flic.kr/p/7dyahv
  • RT (BenjaminAddy) You cannot nurture the concept of social justice to a group without simultaneously developing a sense of community.
  • RT (leahgolby) It’s been almost 4 years since I went #carfree. The more time passes, the more resolved I am to use cars when needed, but not own one.
  • RT (lutzfernandez) ”I would not, could not in a car.” – Dr. Seuss

To Wrap

This StreetFilms video made the email rounds this week around northern Michigan. Minneapolis is fast becoming the premier commuter cycling city in the U.S. and last I checked, their motorized traffic and winters are much worse than Traverse City.  The lesson? It’s not the weather that stops active transportation, it’s the infrastructure…or, the lack thereof.  Build it and they will come.

Graphic Friday: The Freedom, Fun And Excitement Factor

May 27, 2011 1 comment

Graphic Friday

“Everyone had fun and remembers the wind blowing through their hair when they rode their bikes as kids. What they’re missing is that same sense of freedom and excitement and fun.”

Andy Clark, president of League of American Bicyclists, In an article for Voice of America titled Number of Bicyclers Soars Along with US Gas Prices which reminded me of a previous Friday Graphic.

Engage & Represent: I’ll Sign Yours If You Sign Mine

May 26, 2011 1 comment

Engage & Represent

(gossip edition)

Nominating petitions are out for the Traverse City city commission and the mayoral seat. City residents are allowed to sign the number of petitions equal to the seats available. So, you can sign one potential mayoral petition and three potential commissioner petitions. 

I’ve signed two petitions so far for potential commission candidates Brian Haas and incumbent Jim Carruthers. Signing the petition isn’t necessarily an endorsement, but I would like to see both of them in the election cycle. Candidates need 70, plus some for insurance, signatures in case some signatures are discredited for whatever reason and they have until August 9th to have the petitions in and accepted. If you want to run, you can pick up the packet at the City Clerk’s office. 

Because of the low number of signatures needed, many readers won’t be asked to sign a petition, however I’m curious who already has signed whom’s petition. This is the lazy man’s way to see who has picked up nominating packets. 

_

Have you signed anyone’s nominating petition?

_

_

Related Posts in the Series

What To Expect When Roads Are Dangerous by Design

May 25, 2011 1 comment

Dangerous by Design

Nationally, the number of people killed while walking, which includes people in wheelchairs, was over 47,000 over the last 10 years; that is close to 5,000 people per year.  67% of those deaths occurred on roads that received federal money, where innovation and people focused amenities can often get tied up in bureaucratic guidelines that favor motorized traffic as a priority over other roadway users and it is only recently that DOTs began to seriously contemplate protection of neighborhoods through designs that reduce noise and pollution.

These are the basic findings in Transportation for America’s latest report: Dangerous by Design: Solving the Epidemic of Preventable Pedestrian Deaths (and Making Great Neighborhoods) that can be downloaded but also includes an online interactive map of pedestrian fatalities for specific localities.

As far as Traverse City’s corner of the world, crashes resulting in a fatality for people on foot or wheel chair are lower in the Grand Traverse region than the rest of the state. In the 10 year span of the report, 1,468 people were killed in Michigan, of which 8 were in Grand Traverse County. Nearly a death a year is nothing to celebrate, but comparatively, this is possibly a good sign in terms of our local streets where the majority of walking occurs.

Screen-grab of T4America's interactive: ped fatalities within 60 miles of TC between '00-'09

The Type Of Road Matters

Nationally, 60% of all urban pedestrian fatalities occurred on roads with speed limits 40 and above; GT County’s share of such cases exceeds the national average. In the county 100% of pedestrian fatalities occur on those types of roads. The fatalities closest to Traverse City specifically occurred on Grand View Parkway and Munson Ave.’s Miracle Mile (RE)–all locations with high levels of people on foot conflicting with designs that encourage high speeds in areas where people want to cross. Crosswalks remain infrequent and perceived dangerous in these places.

At T4America’s online report you can download’s Michigan’s 2011 report (PDF available) and use their map to explore other locations. I suspect, NW Lower Michigan is comparatively fortunate due to low population numbers on or near large arterials. If you type in Ann Arbor’s 60 mile radius fatality map, you can see how much room for improvement Michigan as a state has.

Michigan’s Pedestrian Danger Index ranks 19th among the 50 states, placing it near the bottom. When specifically looking at the percentages of the population over 65 years old involved in fatalities, Michigan’s rank then improves slightly to 24th, but still nothing to be proud of; 12.4% of the population over 65 represents 18.6% of the pedestrian fatalities. This is one reason AARP is one of the leading champions of complete streets policies.

Michigan also has some glaring disparities when we look at different socio-economic and ethnic demographics. Both the African-American and Hispanic populations show higher rates of fatalities as percent of the population, as shown in the graph above. It’s worth noting, Michigan’s disproportionate fatality rate amongst African-American population is well above the national rate and reflects the poor infrastructure investment in those communities predominately African-American as well as with disproportionate rates of low-income individuals. Infrastructure investment is a social justice issue and reflected in Michigan’s primary metro area ranking as the 12th most dangerous place to go for walk in the nation (DetNews).

The Need For Speed Over Safety

Being able to see the Google street-view on T4America’s interactive map is instructive. Where there are fatalities, there tends to clearly be a road that is visually dangerous by design, meaning, that it is prioritized for maximum width, lanes and speed of motorized vehicles and cleared of obstacles like crosswalks, bike lanes, street trees and, often, the small investment of a sidewalk. This is what many of us are working to change on our own arterials and countless others are campaigning for both locally and at the national level.

The T4America studies points to a few main factors in the number of pedestrian deaths:

  • Practice of wider roads and lanes: studies have shown 12 ft lanes in urban areas have no benefit compared to 10-ft lanes in capacity or safety.
  • Designing for Speed:  Less than 1% of ped fatalities occurred on a roadway with a known speed limit of 20-mph.
  • Incomplete Streets: Infrastructure for people makes a huge difference. Wide sidewalks on both sides of the road, clearly marked and frequent cross-walks and bike lanes make the streets safer for ALL users.

We should note, these statistics only measure the worse case scenarios that result in someone killed while walking. Walkability of a location is largely measured by our experiences and the many close calls and/or comfort levels of walking. As well, data on people injured while walking is unreliable as much of it goes unreported or isn’t collected. GT County’s South Airport, for example, is certainly one of those main roads with high speeds where we’d expect a serious pedestrian crash–we are fortunate we haven’t had one in the last 10 years.

If you have an interest in numbers, take a look and let us know what you see.

Where’s The Hotel And Tunnel Project?

May 24, 2011 3 comments

A Mini Crank

According to the Record Eagle, the hotel tied to the Garland St. Tunnel, which was set to begin this spring, is on hold due to financing process. The snag rests on a USDA loan guarantee that, according to developer Jeff Schmitz, has “complicated it to the hilt” (Record Eagle).

Despite having serious concerns over the Garland Street Tunnel, I’m in support of the Hotel Indigo project and it’s unfortunate that they are stuck in the financial mud. I hope they can get it done. However, this latest news, combined with extra costs already revealed, raises more questions about the likelihood that the money, and opportunity, is available for the City to build anything other than a long, dark, narrow tunnel.

It’s my opinion that the City remains deluded that $1.3 million is enough to build something that people will gravitate towards. And that includes, the true costs of the complete project which are more than simply the hole in the ground with a fresh paint job and lights. For pedestrian tunnels to live up to potential, they require either favorable topography or extensive, innovative design at both entry points. It’s unclear where the $1.1 M, $1.3 M  $1.4 M threshold begins and ends, and thus, if we are being honest,  it’s unclear how much the tunnel will actually cost in the end.

The hotel developers had hinted that they were willing to chip in more resources to make the tunnel something designed to acceptable standards. If it comes to it, I trust their latest finance solutions include that flexibility.

Again, moving on and willing to proven wrong.

Excellent Marketing: “The World Has Changed. You Can Too”

May 24, 2011 1 comment

Video Tuesday

By WWF-Canada via @TheUrbanCountry

Are you in la-la land?

_

Park the car a little further away today and walk–think of it as training for Smart Commute Week.

_

This Wednesday, Become A Bicycle Lobbyist

May 23, 2011 Leave a comment

Announcement

This Wednesday is the annual Lucinda Means Bicycle Advocacy Day in Lansing. Visit the League of Michigan’s Bicyclists’ website for more information & to register. There is a group driving down from Northern Michigan if you’re interested in car-pooling. Contact TART Trails or the Cherry Capital Cycling Club by Tuesday to hitch a ride.

Key issues to be discussed with representatives: