This week’s discussion over at Plan for TC is focusing in on street infrastructure in regard to safety for Pedestrians and Bikers.
The question of safety is fairly myopic. It implies that the only reason to provide something like Complete Street infrastructure is to fix a safety issue. As if, the possibility of an extra expense (or shifting of expenses) needs to be justified by that marker alone.
A redesign of the street network is about applying equity to multiple-modal transportation options. That’s first and foremost. It’s a decision by a city to not only serve the basic needs of all its citizens, but to actually promote a different means of transporting oneself a half-mile down the street to get milk.
We need incentives to change habits. A transportation network that is leading-edge in terms of placing walkers & bikers as priorities is one incentive.
Hence, Safety in design leads to safety in numbers leads to….(one thing it leads to is increased social interactions which have proven to increase economic activity)
That all said, there are several parts of Traverse City that are unsafe, or perceived unsafe, to either fully utilize or to simply cross. A note about safety, when you’re exposed as a walker or biker, the perception of safety is often the deciding factor.
A quick list:
- South Entrance of NMC on Front St.
- Munson Ave.
- Garfield & Front Intersection
- The entire route of Garfield (Agave is .5 miles away from my house, difficult to reach)
- Woodmere (nice Blvd, but is unconnected. TART crossing has blind spot)
- 8th St. (Suicidal)
- Front St. (different stretches have different issues)
- Cass St. & Union St. South of Old Town
- 7th St. crossing of Division
- 14th St.
- Division
- Grandview and Division
If it’s in the city and there are businesses and homes, I’m calling it a neighborhood.
The interesting realization looking at this list is that most of these are also trouble spots for automobile traffic. Take the 8th Street speedway for example: It’s a 25 mph zone that most people use to go 35-45mph. It’s difficult not to. It’s counter-intuitive, but if we reduced lanes and cut the speed-limit to 20 mph (or left it at 25mph) we would actually see increased flow of traffic. One reason being is that you can fit more cars closer together in the same amount of space at slower speeds.
We could talk about similar schemes on Division St.
Fascinating stuff.
Do you have examples of neighborhood roads that are dangerous to bikers & pedestrians as they are currently designed?
What is the rationale for implementing a Complete Streets plan?
Supreme happiness to those who share:
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
Reader's Comments